
The pixel reports 70 leads. Check the CRM for genuine enquiries and how they were counted. Only a matching definition and period let you assess the discrepancy.
Faulty tracking is one of the biggest reasons for bad marketing decisions. When the data is wrong, you optimize into the void.
Clean tracking needs clear event definitions, correct values and required consent. A green pixel does not prove complete data. Follow a controlled conversion from its source to the report, and reconcile real leads or purchases with the backend separately.
Blocked scripts and page errors can prevent browser events. Server-side tracking can reduce technical gaps when a permitted event comes from an appropriate source. Required consent still applies. A browser-dependent event can disappear before reaching the server.
A 7-day click window rarely shows the whole truth. Data-driven attribution assigns credit using available signals. It does not automatically establish which ad caused additional revenue. Compare models and windows on the same basis.
Often the pixel and the tag manager send the same conversion. That leads to doubled values and distorted results.
Phone or CRM leads stay invisible if you don't import them. Offline uploads can make later sales outcomes more visible. They do not guarantee complete reporting.
Inconsistent parameters make clean reports impossible. A clear UTM system gives you reliable analysis.
Check the data basis before making a budget decision. Record which events arrive, which are missing and which results are only attributed. That makes the limits of the report visible.
We check these errors during account reviews, as a Meta ads agency and a Google ads agency. The findings determine which technical change the setup needs.
The technical groundwork sits in Server-side tracking with the Conversion API.
Google: consent in server-side tagging · Meta: verify receipt, deduplication and matching.